2014 Seminar Logo1

fgs ptp donate

MGC Blog Calendar

Loading ...

MGC Blog Latest Posts

bostonstatehouse - small lime
We're Taking Genealogy to the State House!
General Legislation
Rate this blog entry:
10000vaccinated
Vital Statistics and a Menace to Public Health
Legislation Massachusetts
Rate this blog entry:
5198696196 391bfa2a8c
What is it about genealogists and the SSDI?
Legislation Federal
Rate this blog entry:

MGC Blog Tag Cloud

records access Newsletter IGS S3432 threats to access Social Security Administration Annual Meeting and Seminar introduction MGC Georgia Rhode Island FGS legislation Pennsylvania SSA RPAC 2012 Annual Meeting Legal Genealogist DPH Access Arkansas DMF; SSDI; Tax Fraud; legislation outreach Alfred DeMaria blog DMF Massachusetts budget cuts fraud smallpox Health pedigree IAJGS Advocacy APG S1534 SSDI Identity Theft TIGTA audit closures Ethnicity ISJGS Melinde Byrne land records State House Legislative Tennessee Tax Fraud Rep. Michael Capuano (MA) Georgia Archives Jan Meisels Allen family medical history Registration Linda McCleary APG Roundtable Jacobson v Massachusetts records access Records Access Fred Moss Billie Fogarty Presidential Citation Society Showcase communication Death Master File Lame Duck IAJGS Harold Henderson Thomas MacEntee Speakers award FamilySearch online registration legislation 2012 Seminar Records Access Massachusetts medical profile RPAC Civil Records DMF Henning Jacobson Vital Records Jan Alpert Alvie Davidson Georgia Public Records threats to access Open Access inheritable disease Annual Seminar Programs NGS State archives pensions HR 295 IRS Free FGS access SSA Rep. Richard Nugent (FL) War of 1812 Presenters Education Judy Russell SSDI NERGC Virginia Delaware FGS Conference Bruce Cohen Richard McCoy civil records Sharon Sergeant Advocacy Transparency NAPHSIS David Rencher Oklahoma Rep. Sam Johnson (TX) HR6205 New Hampshire volunteers Jan Meisels Allen Instruction legislators HR3475 Lou Szucs Elections Tennessee FOIA sysoon Congress State Library Stan Nyberg Senate Public Records Richard Nugent Kenneth Ryesky Congress mail forwarding budget Federal Vendors volunteerism New Jersey NEHGS HR3475 Sponsors seminar S-1534 legislation open access New Hampshire identity fraud HR295 medical pedigree health history Annual Seminar family traits public access funding Virginia Kate Auspitz Randy Seaver NFOIC Donna Holt Siemiatoski archives Michael J. Astrue records access Genealogy State legislation Ancestry humane diagnosis Arkansas

Member Login

Join MGC Today!

 
To Renew Online
Log in then visit
your Profile under
the blue User Menu, above
OR
Join/renew with the

Affiliations

fgsmemberlogo

MGC Sentinel logo MGC Sentinel Logo

MGC Sentinel

Keeping Watch Over Massachusetts Public Records

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

What Is Buried in the Budget Bill? SSDI Closure!

Posted by on in Legislation Federal
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 4414
  • 0 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Here at MGC, we’ve been watching the U.S. government confront the massive issue of fraudulent payments. The IRS has been hemorrhaging money by issuing refunds to people without checking to see if the tax returns are truthful. The scope of this problem is staggering. See our post, “The Bottom Line on Tax Fraud? $5 Billion per Year,” from August 5th, 2012. Of that $5 billion, $415 million in potentially fraudulent returns were issued to dead people.

As the Washington Post showed in its November 3rd, 2012, infographic, the IRS receives a full list of the nation’s dead from the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File. The IRS simply wasn’t bothering to check tax returns against the DMF before they issued refunds. The U.S. Congress has been watching this situation and has called administrators in for questioning. Over the past two years, the IRS has made some progress in halting fraudulent payments, but perhaps not enough.

With this history in mind, it is not surprising to find that the issue is included in the new U.S. budget compromise. MGC vice president Sharon Sergeant alerted me to an online video from the Business Week people at Bloomberg news. In it, the reporters struggle to understand one of our old friends, the Death Master File, whose public face we call the Social Security Death Index. Sharon wrote:

Watch how Bloomberg video kind of ends with a question mark over the purpose and budget utility of the DMF closing.

http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2013-12-11/how-the-death-master-file-figures-into-budget-deal

My thanks to Jan Meisels Allen of the Records Preservation and Access Committee (RPAC) for sending an alert with a link to the budget text.

http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20131209/AMNT-113-HJRes59sa-1R_xml.pdf

Section 203  starts on page 32

That section runs for ten pages and includes much of the text of the bills we’ve been following for two years. My first reading of the budget bill gives me these impressions:

  • All information on a person’s death (their name, residence location, and Social Security number) is withheld from everyone for three years.
  • The Secretary of Commerce must institute a completely new program that will “certify persons who are eligible to access” the Death Master File during the first three years.
  • The Secretary must also create a completely new program to audit those people for compliance.
  • Only people with the following concerns are allowed to be certified:
    • Fraud prevention
    • Implementing a government law, regulation, or fiduciary duty
  • Only people who can guarantee safeguards to the information are allowed to be certified.
  • People who misuse the Death Master File information during the first three years can be fined $1,000 per instance, up to a total of $250,000 per calendar year.
  • The Secretary must also create a fee schedule to cover all the costs of putting the certification and monitoring programs together.
  • The Secretary of Commerce must also report annually the total fees collected to the Committee on Finance in the Senate and the Committee of Ways on Means in the House.
  • The Death Master File is exempted from the Freedom of Information Act. (This is the tool through which genealogists gained access to the SSDI.)
  • Any possible loopholes providing payments to people who are incarcerated are closed.

A few clauses present in earlier bills are missing from this version. One is the Sunset clause that would have ended a public version of the Death Master File completely in 2015. The other is the clause that permits genealogists working under contract to the Department of Defense to continue using this file in their efforts to repatriate the remains of soldiers lost in war. Those genealogists track down living descendants for DNA matching that will ensure proper identity for repatriation and burial of our heroes.

It would take an experienced economist to get underneath the government finance information to figure out how this will work in balancing the budget. I’m not that person, but I believe the following points are in order.

The fees to be imposed by the Secretary of Commerce are limited to those required to set up all the new programs for certification and audit. The costs of reporting the results to Congress are not covered in this text as far as I can see. There is nothing on the “plus” side for the budget there.

Fines for misuse of Death Master File information could range from $1,000 to $250,000 per year. Could this be helpful? The fines would have to be imposed by the Secretary of Commerce. Through what mechanism? How long does it take to discover and then prove that a person owes a fine? How is it investigated? What is the mechanism through which the person can protest against the fine? How long does that take? If the original fees are high enough to cover the creation of the expansion of government as required, will individuals pay them or will institutions pay them?

And, finally, by what mechanism has the government been losing money all along? Was it through public access to death information? Or was it through limiting or not using access to death information?

Sorry, the answer is that fraud happens when access is limited. More to follow.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
Barbara serves as the Federal Records Director. She is a Board-certified genealogist who works for the Massachusetts Society of the Colonial Dames of America as a Verifying Genealogist and for the Welles Family Association as a Genealogist. Her volunteer service includes a stint as President of MGC. She holds a master’s degree in the management of non-profits from the Florence Heller School at Brandeis University. You can read her own blog, The Demanding Genealogist, at demandinggenealogist.blogspot.com.

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 25 April 2014